This picture is the location that an Alaska prisoner tried to receive DNA testing to prove his innocents and the Supreme Court of Alaska denied him that privilege.
If the test would actually prove this man, William Osborne, innocent or guilty then why would the state deny him of that. You could possibly be holding the wrong person accountable for an action he did not do.
They were basically saying that the states are doing a fine job with the testing of DNA and that the federal courts in the state of Alaska does not need to get involved for a case such as this. Also saying that if they were to give this man testing it would open doors to a lot of other people who would suddenly request testing as well. Sounds skeptical in my eyes, and probably in the eyes of a lot of others. Entirely too much skepticism within the judgments of the courts. Maybe it should be granted to those that request it. It is up in the air.
SF . :)
SF . :)
No comments:
Post a Comment